Blog

OpenRocket: Simulation and Design Software for Rocketry

OpenRocket is a powerful, open-source software tool designed for simulating and designing model rockets. Created both for rocketry enthusiasts and professionals, it allows users to model, simulate, and analyze rocket flight behavior. Whether you’re a teacher instructing physics, a hobbyist building your own rocket, or an engineer exploring new design ideas, Open Rocket provides a user-friendly platform to bring your ideas to life.

OpenRocket is open-source meaning anyone can contribute to the project, making it a constantly evolving tool for the rocketry community.

openrocket

Simulation Capabilities

One of the main benefits of OpenRocket is its simulation capabilities. The software provides accurate predictions of rocket flight paths based on a variety of parameters such as:

Aerodynamics: OpenRocket simulates aerodynamic forces and uses physics to predict how a rocket will behave during flight. The software takes into account factors like drag, thrust, and lift.

Flight Stages: It can model multi-stage rockets, accurately simulating the separation of stages and the resulting changes in flight trajectory.

Recovery Systems: OpenRocket can simulate recovery systems like parachutes, allowing users to assess the performance and deployment of recovery devices.

Environmental Conditions: Users can input various environmental factors such as wind speed and air pressure, which can significantly affect flight behavior.

OpenRocket includes a suite of design tools that allow users to model every aspect of their rocket. Key design features include:

openrocket
OpenRocket’s main rocket design window

Rocket Design Editor: This editor lets users create a rocket from scratch. You can define body tubes, fins, engines, and other components, adjusting your dimensions and materials to see how they influence performance.

Component Database: OpenRocket comes with a built-in database of common rocket components, such as engines, nose cones, and recovery systems. Users can easily select and use these into their designs.

Graphing and Analysis Tools for Flight Data

openrocket

Once you’ve designed and simulated a rocket flight, OpenRocket generates detailed data that can be graphed and analyzed. The analysis tools allow users to examine important flight parameters, such as:

Altitude vs. Time: View how the rocket’s altitude changes during flight.

Velocity vs. Time: Track the rocket’s speed at every moment.

Acceleration: Study the forces acting on the rocket throughout its flight.

Thrust and Drag: Assess the performance of the rocket engine and the effect of air resistance.

These data visualization tools help users optimize their designs and improve performance before ever launching a rocket.

User-Friendly Interface and Customization Options

Despite its complex capabilities, OpenRocket boasts a clean and intuitive user interface. Key features include:

Drag-and-Drop Functionality: The software allows for easy component placement and rearrangement within the design editor.

Customizable Settings: Users can fine-tune numerous parameters, such as engine specifications, weight distribution, and recovery systems, giving them total control over their rocket’s design and simulation.

Export and Import Options: OpenRocket supports importing designs and data from other software, and it also allows users to export results in various formats for further analysis or reporting.

Getting started with OpenRocket is easy. Here’s a step-by-step guide to downloading, installing, and setting up the software:

Download the Software

  • Go to the official OpenRocket website: https://openrocket.info.
  • Find the “Download” link in the menu at the top of the page.
  • Find the link to download the version for your operating system (Windows, macOS, or Linux).
  • Click the download link to start the process.

Install OpenRocket

  • Once the file has downloaded, open the installer.
  • Follow the on-screen instructions to complete the installation process.
  • After installation, launch OpenRocket by clicking the program icon.

Set Up and Configuration

  • Upon first launch, you will be prompted to configure some basic settings. These include setting up default units (imperial or metric), selecting a simulation environment (e.g., wind conditions, altitude), and importing any pre-existing designs you may have.
  • Familiarize yourself with the user interface, including the design editor, simulation controls, and analysis tools.

Now you’re ready to start designing your first rocket!

Education

OpenRocket is an excellent tool for educators looking to teach students about the principles of rocketry, aerodynamics, and physics. Its simulation features allow students to experiment with different designs and see the impact of various factors on rocket flight. Teachers can assign projects where students design their rockets, simulate their flights, and analyze the results to understand physics concepts.

Hobbyists and DIY Projects

Amateur rocket enthusiasts can use OpenRocket to simulate and perfect their rocket designs without needing to conduct costly or dangerous real-world tests. OpenRocket is especially useful for hobbyists experimenting with various components such as engines and recovery systems.

OpenRocket is supported by a passionate and active community. The software’s open-source nature encourages collaboration, and the community plays a big role in providing feedback, suggesting improvements, and sharing designs. Some of the key resources available for users include:

User Forums: OpenRocket has dedicated forums where users can ask questions, share ideas, and discuss technical issues with fellow rocketry enthusiasts.

Online Documentation: Comprehensive user guides and tutorials are available on the Open Rocket website, covering everything from basic design principles to advanced simulation techniques.

User Groups and Social Media: Many OpenRocket users participate in local rocketry clubs, Facebook groups, and Discord channels. These platforms provide a great space for networking, sharing experiences, and collaborating on projects.

Bug Tracker and Feature Requests: OpenRocket’s GitHub repository allows users to report bugs, request features, and contribute code to the project, making it an ever-evolving tool.

If you run into technical issues, the OpenRocket forums and documentation are excellent first stops. The development team and other users are very responsive to troubleshooting questions, and you can often find solutions to common problems there.

OpenRocket is an invaluable tool for anyone involved in rocketry, whether for educational, research, or hobbyist purposes. Its powerful simulation and design features, combined with a user-friendly interface and active community support, make it a must-have for anyone looking to design and test rockets. With OpenRocket, the possibilities are endless – from creating rockets that perform better to helping students learn about the science of flight, this software has something for everyone in the rocketry world.

OpenRocket Links


Check out more of my blog posts about rocketry

Antweight Motors – A Critical Design Decision

The antweight division in combat robotics features constant action where small robots weighing 1 pound (150 grams) or less engage in fast-paced battles. With weight-stingy antweights, every detail of the robot’s design, from weaponry to drive train, plays a critical role in a robot’s performance. One such crucial factor is the motor. The motor size, or more specifically, the type of motors used and their specifications, can make or break a robot’s ability to perform efficiently.

In this blog, I’ll dive into the importance of motor sizes in antweights and how to choose the right motor for your robot.

Fingertech Silver Spark gearmotor

Motors are at the heart of every robot’s movement. In combat robots, motors control various aspects of the robot, from driving to weapon systems. These motors determine the speed, torque, and overall power output of the robot, directly affecting its combat effectiveness. Whether it’s a simple drive motor or a powerful weapon motor, choosing the right motor size is essential for building a competitive robot.

In antweight robots, motors come in various sizes and configurations, each with its unique characteristics. The key factors to consider when choosing a motor are:

1. Speed: The RPM (revolutions per minute) of the motor dictates how fast the robot moves or how quickly the weapon spins. A higher RPM can result in faster speeds and quicker weapon action but may sacrifice torque.

2. Torque: Torque is the rotational force a motor generates, which helps move the robot and power the weapon systems. A motor with high torque is essential for robots that require high pushing power or need to deliver a strong blow from a weapon.

3. Size and Weight: Antweight robots are limited to 1 pound (150 grams) in weight, so the size and weight of the motor must be carefully balanced with the robot’s overall design. Motors that are too large or heavy will reduce the available space and weight for other components.

4. Voltage and Power: The voltage rating of the motor will determine how much power it can handle. Most antweight robots run on 7.4V or 14.8V battery systems, so selecting a motor that operates within these parameters is important for maximizing performance and ensuring safety.

DC Motors

DC (direct current) motors are the type of motor used in antweight robots. They are simple, efficient, and can be easily controlled for both drive and weapon systems. DC motors come in various sizes, with small, lightweight motors typically chosen for their ability to provide high RPM and reasonable torque for their size.

Brushless Motors (BLDC – brushless direct current motor): These motors are increasingly popular in combat robotics because they are more efficient, reliable, and lightweight than brushed motors. They offer a higher power-to-weight ratio and are perfect for antweights, where every gram counts. For rotating weapons like spinners, a brushless motor is the preferred choice due to the high power needed to achieve high rotational speeds. 

Brushed Motors: While brushed motors are older technology, they are still used in the sport. They tend to be less efficient than brushless motors but are often cheaper and easier to control. While some antweight robots may still use brushed motors for driving, brushless options are gaining traction due to their improved performance. 

Gear Motors

Gear motors combine a motor with a gearbox, reducing the RPM and increasing the torque. These are particularly useful for driving wheels and controlling more powerful weapons. By using a gear motor, you can trade off speed for greater force, which is essential in close combat situations.

Servo Motors

Servo motors are primarily used in robot arms and weapon systems. They allow for precise control of rotation, making them ideal for applications requiring high accuracy, such as a rotating weapon or a lift mechanism. In antweights, servo motors can be used for systems where tight control is needed.

Step Motors

Step motors are generally not used with antweights due to their limitations in power and speed.

When selecting a motor for your antweight design, size does matter—but it’s not just about choosing the smallest motor possible. It’s about balancing motor characteristics to meet the specific needs of your robot. Here’s a basic guideline for motor selection:

For Drive Motors: Antweight robots typically use motors that provide a balance between speed and torque. If you are building a robot with high mobility and agility, opt for a small, lightweight motor with a higher RPM. Conversely, if your robot focuses on pushing or ramming, prioritize a motor with higher torque and lower RPM.

For Weapon Motors: If your robot features a spinner or other high-speed weapon, choosing a motor with high RPM and sufficient torque is essential. Brushless motors are generally preferred for weapon systems due to their higher efficiency and durability. Be sure to select a motor that can withstand the intense demands of weapon action, often requiring quick starts and stops.

Weight Considerations: In antweight robots, the motor should take up as little space as possible while still providing adequate performance. Excess weight in motors can reduce the weight allowance for other components like armor or weaponry. A well-chosen motor should be as compact as possible without compromising on necessary performance.

Motor efficiency plays a critical role in maximizing battery life. Efficient motors use less power for the same output, meaning you can get more combat time per battery charge. In antweight combat robotics, where each second counts, efficient motors can give you the upper hand in longer fights.

Battery life is also tied to motor performance. More powerful motors may drain your battery faster, which could leave you vulnerable towards the end of a match. Therefore, it’s important to strike a balance between motor power, speed, and energy consumption.

In antweight combat robotics, motor selection is one of the most important factors determining your robot’s performance. The size, type, and specifications of the motors directly impact everything from speed to weapon power and control. Whether you’re building a nimble, quick robot for agility or a powerful bot with a strong weapon, understanding motor sizes and how they fit into your design will give you a competitive edge in the arena.

Remember, every robot is different, and the key to success is finding the perfect motor combination for your unique needs. Experiment with different motors, gear ratios, and configurations, and you’ll find the sweet spot for your antweight combat robot. Happy building and battling!


Click here for more robotics blog posts

Check out my collection of Knowledge Base Articles for more robotic info.

Finding Rocketry Suppliers Online

Whether you’re just getting started in rocketry or you’re a seasoned rocketeer looking for advanced components, life is easier by finding rocketry suppliers online. Although several online suppliers closed up shop in the past decade or so (Rocketry Ventures, Thrustline Rocketry, Rocketry Shop), there are still many great options available. I’ll save you a Google search – here is a list of reputable rocketry suppliers that cater to enthusiasts of all skill levels.

Note: this is a great page to bookmark for a future one-page supplier reference.

www.estesrockets.com

Estes is one of the most well-known names in hobby rocketry. They offer a wide range of model rocket kits, motors, and accessories, perfect for beginners and intermediate rocketeers.

Products

  • Model rocket kits (beginner to advanced)
  • Rocket engines (low-powered)
  • Launch pads and accessories
  • Educational rocketry materials

Best known for making rocketry fun and educational for young enthusiasts.

www.aerotech-rocketry.com

AeroTech acquired Quest Aerospace, a model rocket kit and motor manufacturer, in July 2013 when RCS rocket motor components (which is part of AeroTech Consumer Aerospace) purchased the company’s assets and intellectual property; effectively merging the two brands under the AeroTech umbrella

Aerotech is a leader in mid and high-powered rocketry, offering advanced motors, kits, and accessories. With the acquisition of Quest Aerospace, they now also have beginner and intermediate rocket kits, as well as low-powered rocket motors.

Products

  • Model rocket kits (beginner to intermediate)
  • Rocket engines (low-powered)
  • Launch pads and accessories
  • Educational rocketry kits
  • Launch equipment
  • High-powered rocket motors (mid and high-level)
  • Rocket kits (including custom components)
  • Recovery devices (parachutes, streamers)

Aerotech offeres advanced rocketry systems and motors for mid to high-power rockets, along with Quest products that are great for beginners and schools with educational rocketry kits.

www.apogeerockets.com

Apogee Components is a respected supplier that offers a wide range of products, from beginner model rocket kits to advanced high-power components. They also provide extensive educational resources on rocket building.

Products

  • Model and high-power rocket kits
  • Rocket motors and engines
  • Rocketry tools and recovery systems
  • Design and building supplies

Educational resources and high-quality, customizable parts for advanced rocketry.

www.madcowrocketry.com

Madcow Rocketry is known for producing high-quality, durable kits and components for both beginner and high-power rocketry. They specialize in kits that can withstand high-speed flights.

Products

  • High-power rocket kits
  • Rocket motors and components
  • Custom recovery systems
  • Launch pads and equipment

Durability and quality in high-power rocketry kits.

www.balsamachining.com

Balsa Machining Service specializes in custom rocket kits, parts, and materials, including precision-machined components and materials for serious rocketeers.

Products

  • Precision rocket components (fins, airframes, etc.)
  • High-power rocket kits
  • Specialty materials (carbon fiber, fiberglass)

Custom, high-precision parts for serious hobbyists.

www.locprecision.com

LOC Precision is a respected name in high-powered rocketry, offering rugged and reliable rocket kits, parts, and motors designed to withstand extreme conditions. Their products are widely used by advanced rocketeers.

Products

  • High-powered rocket kits
  • Precision components (airframes, fins, couplers)
  • Recovery systems and deployment gear

High-quality kits and components for high-power rocketry.

www.rocketmotorcomponents.com

RMC specializes in high-power rocket motors, components, and materials. Their motors are designed for high-performance rocketry, and they also offer various accessories for customizing and enhancing rocket builds.

Products

  • High-power rocket motors
  • Components for motor construction
  • Rocket kits and accessories

Components for high-powered and experimental rocketry.

www.therocketryforum.com

The “manufacturers, vendors, sales & deals” section of the Rocketry Forum is a great place to buy and sell rocketry parts, kits, and equipment. It’s a community-driven marketplace where hobbyists exchange gear, often at discounted prices.

Finding rocketry suppliers online is essential for rocket enthusiasts. The reputable suppliers on this page offer a wide variety of products on their official websites. Bookmark this page as a future one-page reference for online rocketry supplies.

Rocket Recovery Systems: How Parachutes and Streamers Work

Rocket recovery systems are essential for safely bringing a rocket back to Earth after its launch. These systems ensure that the rocket or its components return in one piece, preventing damage and allowing for reusability, which is a key factor in rocket science and hobbyist rocketry.

In rocketry, a recovery system is designed to slow down the rocket’s descent after it has completed its flight. Without a recovery system, a rocket would fall to the ground at high speeds, often resulting in a crash landing that could destroy valuable equipment. The goal of any recovery system is to ensure a soft, controlled descent, minimizing damage to the rocket and its components, such as the engine and electronics.

Parachutes are the most common recovery system used in model rocketry projects. The parachute works by increasing the surface area of the rocket during its descent, creating drag that slows down the rocket’s fall.

rocket recovery systems
Estes Rockets 15 Inch Nylon Parachute

How Parachutes Work

When a rocket reaches its peak altitude (apogee), the parachute is deployed, typically through a small explosive charge. The parachute opens and creates a large surface area that interacts with the air, creating significant drag force. This drag force counters the gravitational pull on the rocket, slowing its descent.

There are different types of parachutes used in rocketry, but the most common are:

Flat Circular Parachutes: These are the most basic and common type of parachute. They open quickly and provide decent stability.

Toroidal Parachutes: These are ring-shaped parachutes that provide stable, controlled descents with low oscillation and are often used for larger rockets.

Parachute Physics

The physics behind parachute deployment is largely based on drag. The larger the parachute, the more drag it produces, and the slower the rocket falls. The shape of the parachute, the speed of deployment, and the altitude at which it’s deployed all influence its effectiveness. If the parachute deploys too early or too late, or the parachute lines become tangled, the rocket could experience excessive velocity during descent, which could result in damage.

While parachutes are the most well-known recovery system, streamers are another option, often used for smaller rockets. Streamers are strips of material, typically lightweight plastic, that are attached to the rocket. Upon deployment, these strips unfurl and create drag, though to a lesser extent than a parachute.

rocket recovery systems
Apogee Components Mylar Streamers

How Streamers Work

Streamers function similarly to parachutes in that they increase the surface area of the rocket, creating drag and slowing its descent. However, because they don’t have the same surface area as a parachute, streamers typically result in a faster descent.

The key benefit of streamers is their simplicity and reliability. They don’t require the same precision in deployment as parachutes and can be more effective in windy conditions. Streamers are also less likely to become tangled during deployment.

Streamer Physics

Streamers create drag, but not to the extent that parachutes do. The primary factor here is that the smaller surface area means the rocket will descend faster, but the deceleration will still be enough to prevent significant damage on impact. Because streamers don’t require much deployment force, they’re a great option for small model rockets or situations where a softer landing isn’t as critical.

The best streamer size for the slowest descent has a length-to-width of 10 to 1. A streamer that is one inch wide should be at least 10 inches long. A two inch wide streamer should be at least 20 inches long, and so on.

Parachutes

  • Slower descent, resulting in a softer landing.
  • More complex to deploy (requiring a mechanism to open the chute).
  • Better for larger or more valuable rockets, where damage minimization is critical.
  • Can be prone to tangling or failure if not properly packed.

Streamers

  • Faster descent, resulting in a less soft landing.
  • Simpler and lighter than parachutes, often requiring less deployment force.
  • Ideal for smaller rockets or where cost and simplicity are priorities.
  • Less prone to tangling compared to parachutes.

Both parachutes and streamers serve the same basic function: slowing down a rocket’s descent to prevent damage upon landing. Parachutes, with their larger surface area and slower descent, are ideal for larger rockets and those designed for reuse. Streamers are often used in smaller rockets where simplicity, weight, and cost are more important than a soft landing. The nose-below method is the least effective of the three. Personally, I would not recommend that method.

Choosing the right recovery system depends on your rocket’s size, purpose, and the level of risk you’re willing to accept. Understanding the physics behind parachutes and streamers can help rocket enthusiasts design better, safer, and more efficient recovery systems for their launches. Happy flying!

Combat Robotics Online Resources

If you are new to combat robotics, or even a seasoned veteran of many tournaments, information is crucial to becoming a better builder and competitor. Luckily for fighting robot enthusiasts, there is a ton of information available the Internet. Here are just a few of the websites and groups with great combat robotics information.

It started for most of us when we first saw robot fighting on television with either Robot Wars or BattleBots. We were hooked with the first shower of sparks. Even though those shows featured huge bots costing thousands of dollars to build, there is still a lot of information for those of us competing at the lower weight categories.

BattleBots Official Website: The official site for the popular television competition features team profiles, event schedules, match results, and behind-the-scenes content.

The BattleBots Robots: A great resource to learn about the teams competing in BattleBots, with links to their social media and websites.

Reddit – r/battlebots: A subreddit group with over 70,000 members. The group is an independent community for fans of robot combat, not representing any one brand. They welcome those with a casual interest in television shows as well as the enthusiast community.

Hackaday: While not exclusively focused on combat robotics, Hackaday features articles on innovative robot designs, tutorials, and projects that can be relevant to combat robotics builders.

Instructables: This site has many user-generated tutorials on building combat robots, covering various designs and techniques.

Various groups exist for combat robotics enthusiasts, where members share insights, event information, and offer support to each other. Do a search on Facebook and you will find a bunch of them. Here are just a few: (member numbers data as of 1/23/25)

Robot Weight Class Groups

Antweight Combat Robots Facebook Group

Regional Groups

Other

YouTube is a great resource for combat robotics. There are dozens of channels dedicated specifically to combat robotics, including channels from individual builders, teams, commentators, and dedicated news platforms covering the sport and its related events. Here is a small sampling of what is available:

Ray Billings team captain of Hardcore Robotics, and the builder/designer of the BattleBots champion robot Tombstone! This channel focuses on various robotics projects along with some building and competing guidelines. (56K subscribers•177 videos)

Combat Robotics Resources
Witch Doctor Youtube Channel

Team Witch Doctor Those familiar with BattleBots will associate the name with the hugely successful vertical spinner bot with the ribcage design as armor. The channel includes a “Witch Doctor Junior”playlist with team member Andrea Gellatly covering everything you need to know to build and compete an antwaight. (17K subscribers•294 videos)

Robert Cowan DIY YouTube Channel

Robert Cowan Member of Team Copperhead of BattleBots. The channel covers CNC, robotics, various other projects. The channel has many great combat robotics videos, including a playlist of videos about building an antweight Combat Robot. (66.5K subscribers•392 videos)

Team Just ‘Cuz Robotics Seth Schaffer is a Mechanical Engineer with a passion for combat robotics. The channel is dedicated to sharing the knowledge needed to build combat robots and other related DIY projects. He is also a member of the Battlebots team behind the vicious overhead spinner Bloodsport. (10.3K subscribers•225 videos)

Team Panic Channel of an electrical engineer with an interest in robot combat. His videos document his experiences with build logs, tutorials, 3D printing and other robotics stuff! (8.05K subscribers•386 videos)

DrumBotics Welcome to DrumBotics Youtube channel where we will be uploading antweight competition fights updates about our robot and more! (1.4K subscribers•52 videos)

Team Cryptid Robotics This channel includes bot builds and guides about combat robotics. He states the goal of the channel is to grow the sport, build hype for his bots and guides for all the things he “wished existed when I got into combat robotics”. (364 subscribers•71 videos)

Robot Combat Events A listing of combat robotics events in the US.

Ask Aaron Combat Robotics Q&A Team Run Amok started Ask Aaron in March of 2003 to answer the robot combat questions sent to their team. Twenty-one years and 7500 questions later they are still fielding a very broad range of practical, theoretical, arcane, obscure, and sometimes just plain silly questions.

The Robot Combat League A non-profit whose mission is to promote STEM and design and fabrication skills through the sport of Robot Combat. The Robot Combat League is not an official organizing body for Robot Combat.

NHRL Official website of the National Havoc Robot League. The organization is the home of the 3lb, 12lb and 30lb world championships through a series of seven combat robotics tournaments hosted in the House of Havoc. The group is based in Norwalk, CT.

Last, but certainly not least, is the robotics section on my Knowledge Base Articles page. As of this writing, I have nine articles on combat robotics, with everything from The Science Behind Robotic Warfare to Sumo Robotics. You can find my Knowledge Base here.

These resources can be invaluable for anyone interested in combat robotics, whether they’re looking to build their own robot, stay updated on competitions, or connect with other enthusiasts in the community. This is just a very small sampling of what is available. Google (or another search engine) is your friend. A search will reveal a wealth of resources.

The Evolution of 3D Printing: A Historical Overview

3D printing has changed the way we think about production and creativity. From its beginnings in the 1980s to the cutting-edge technologies used today, the history of 3D printing is a story of vision, experimentation and innovation. In this blog post, I will explore the key milestones and those responsible for the development of 3D printing technology and the companies that followed.

The story of 3D printing began in 1981 when Dr. Hideo Kodama of Nagoya Municipal Industrial Research Institute, Japan, filed a patent for a rapid prototyping system. Dr. Kodama had successfully demonstrated the process for creating 3D plastic parts by photo-hardening polymers with UV exposure. 

However, the first significant breakthrough came when Chuck Hull, the co-founder of 3D Systems, created the first 3D printed part on March 9, 1983, through a process he called stereolithography. Hull developed this technology after working for many years developing chemicals and then switching jobs to find himself working with ultraviolet light. Hull filed for a patient for stereolithography apparatus (SLA) in 1984. His technique used ultraviolet light to cure liquid resin layer by layer, creating three-dimensional objects. Today’s 3D resin printers are a direct descendant of Hull’s efforts.  

In 1988, 3D Systems marketed the first commercial 3D printer, the SLA-1, which allowed designers and engineers to create prototypes quickly and efficiently. This was not only the first commercial 3D printer but was also the foundation for the additive manufacturing industry. 

The 1990s included a surge of innovation in 3D printing technologies, with the introduction of new methods including selective laser sintering (SLS) and fused deposition modeling (FDM). 

SLS, developed by Dr. Carl Deckard utilized a laser to fuse powdered materials, allowing for greater design complexity and material versatility. Deckard initially came up with the idea as an undergraduate at the University of Texas at Austin. He continued developing the technology as a Masters and PhD student with the help of Dr. Joe Beaman, a professor at UT Austin. After several years of trial-and-error, Deckard’s machine was capable of manufacturing real parts. 

In 2012, Deckard co-founded Structured Polymers LLC, a company that develops novel polymers for SLS machines. He died at the age of 58, on 23 December 2019. 

Also in the 90s, Scott Crump co-founded Stratasys and patented the FDM process, which involved extruding thermoplastic filaments to build objects layer by layer.  

Crump invented the technology known as FDM or Fused Deposition Modeling, patented it 1989, and founded Stratasys, Inc with his wife Lisa. Mr. Crump was CEO of the company for 25 years until the company’s merger with Objet Ltd. in 2012. 

3D printing began to gain traction beyond prototyping. Industries started exploring its potential for creating end-use parts, molds, and even medical implants. The first 3D-printed organ model was created in 1999, showcasing the technology’s potential in the medical field.  

The start of the 21st century marked a turning point for 3D printing, as 3D printing became more accessible to businesses and individuals.  

A major step in that direction happened in 2004 when Adrian Bowyer initiated the RepRap project. The program was started at the University of Bath in the United Kingdom. RepRap was an open-source initiative aimed at creating a 3D printer that could produce most of its own parts. This essentially making affordable 3D printing technology widely accessible. This open-source initiative sparked a wave of interest in DIY 3D printing and led to the development of affordable desktop printers. 

In 2008, MakerBot was founded, introducing the first user-friendly 3D printer for hobbyists and makers. MakerBot Industries, LLC was an American desktop 3D printer manufacturer company headquartered in New York City. It was founded in January 2009 by Bre Pettis, Adam Mayer, and Zach “Hoeken” Smith to build on the early progress of the RepRap Project. It was acquired by Stratasys in June 2013. As of April 2016, MakerBot had sold over 100,000 desktop 3D printers worldwide. 

This accessibility of 3D printing fueled a global makers movement, inspiring individuals to create their own designs and share them online through platforms like Thingiverse

As 3D printing technology continued to evolve, it found applications in a growing number of industries. In 2012, the first 3D-printed car was unveiled by Local Motors, showcasing the potential for additive manufacturing in the automotive sector. Meanwhile, the healthcare industry began using 3D printing for custom prosthetics, dental implants, and even bioprinting tissues. 

Prusa Research was founded as a one-man startup in 2012 by Josef Prusa, a Czech hobbyist, maker and inventor. Today, Prusa Research has grown to a 700+ team shipping more than 10,000 Prusa printers per month to over 160 countries directly from Prague. 

Watch this YouTube video to find out how Prusa Research was born and what they achieved within only 10 years. 

In 2014, four friends in Shenzhen, China – Chen Chun, Ao Danjun, Liu Huilin, and Tang Jingke, started Creality 3D in a small workshop.  Nowadays, the company consists of more than 550 employees occupied in offices located in Beijing, Shanghai, Wuhan, and Huizhou. The company now sells more than 50,000 3D printers annually.  

In 2018, Sovol, based in Shenzhen, China, was founded with the goal of making 3D printing technology accessible to everyone. The company started by producing filament, accessories, and parts. In 2019, Sovol released its first printer, the SV01. Sovol’s products are designed to be open source, allowing users to customize and enhance their printers. Sovol’s products are known for being affordable, well-made, and easy to use. In 2024, Sovol released its latest printer, the SV08. 

In 2020, a team of engineers from DJI, a Chinese tech giant that dominates the drone market, started Bambu Lab. Like Sovol, the company is based in Shenzhen, China. Bambu Lab now has locations in Shanghai and Austin, Texas.  

The company’s first product, the Bambu Lab X1, was launched on Kickstarter in 2022. The X1 was named one of the Best Inventions of 2022 by Time Magazine. In just a very short time, Bambu Lab has become a major player in the consumer 3d printer business, offering high-quality printers at a fraction of the cost of more expensive systems. 

As we move past 2024, 3D printing continues to evolve at a rapid pace. Sustainability has also become a focal point, with researchers exploring biodegradable materials and closed-loop recycling systems for 3D printing. The future is bright, with potential applications in construction, aerospace, fashion, and even food. 

The history of 3D printing is a testament to the tireless pursuit of innovation. From its start in the 1980s to its status today, 3D printing has changed the way we design, create, and manufacture. As we look ahead, it’s clear that the possibilities for 3D printing are endless. Its impact on our world will only continue to grow. The journey of 3D printing is just beginning so let’s embrace the future of creativity and innovation together! 

Check out 3D printers on my Shop pages

Getting Started in Combat Robotics – it’s easier than you think

Have you been thinking about the possibility of getting into combat robotics? If so, this blog post is just for you.

I decided to write this because I’ve talked to several folks lately who said that BattleBots stuff looks really cool, but they wouldn’t even know where to begin. After all, robotics can be some pretty complicated stuff. And it can be, but the robots competing in the lower weight classes (fairweight, antweight, beetleweight) are not terrorabally technical.

You don’t need a degree in electrical engineering to enjoy fighting robots. All you really need is a desire to learn… plus a little cash (or credit).  And even though money could be tight, I think most would be surprised how cheaply you can get into the hobby.

Your Ticket to Fun

There’s basically three ways to get into the sport. You can buy a package with everything you need to get started, all pre-built and ready to rumble. You can buy a kit which includes all the parts needed for a little shredding machine and build it yourself. Or you can design and build your bot from scratch, which is very attractive for some.

So if you are technically-challenged or not, there’s an avenue for anyone to get into the hobby.

Ready to Rumble

The easiest way is to purchase a all-in-one package with a fully built robot and radio transmitter. With just a little practice, you can be competing in local tournaments in no time.

There are several reputable companies selling these kits. Palm Beach Bots is just one offering “ready to fight” packages. They include FingerTech Robotics’ Viper in such a package. They have several other bots with different configurations, from lifters to vertical spinners, that can be made ready to fight with just a few add-ons.

FingerTech Robotics’ Viper Kit

A google search will direct you to other companies offering all-in-one options.

Don’t Forget Spares

Hopefully, whichever kit you purchase, it comes with a few extra parts because you are going to need them. There’s many times in-between matches you will need to repair the damage your bot incurred in the last bout. In some instances you will need to make repairs to be able to continue. Several people in tournaments will bring more than one robot just in case repairs can’t be done.

This leads us to the major disadvantage of buying one of these “everything included” kits. If you haven’t actually built the bot, you may not have the knowledge of the inner workings enough to make repairs. If that’s the case, you are dead in the water.

A Better Option

In my humble opinion, a much better option to the pre-built kits would be a kit that requires you to actually build the bot yourself. This gives you a working knowledge of how your bot works. You will understand every little thing about the workings of the robot, making repairs much easier. 

These kits include all the individual components including a chassis, drive motors, wheels, an electronic speed controller (ESC), a weapon system (if using one), a battery, and all the necessary wiring.

A few kits even include a radio transmitter and receiver. If the kit doesn’t include a radio, you will need to make sure the receiver that comes with the kit is compatible with the radio you have or plan on purchasing.

Check out radios in my shop pages

Once again, if the kit doesn’t come with spare parts, you will need to purchase those separately.

Which Witch to Watch

Witch Doctor junior playlist on Team Witch Doctor’s YouTube channel

For those wanting to start this way, I’m going to point you to the YouTube channel of one of the prominent BattleBots teams – Team Witch Doctor.  Those familiar with BattleBots will associate the name with the hugely successful vertical spinner bot with the ribcage design as armor. Team Witch Doctor has not only been successful fighting the big boys in BattleBots, they also have a 501c3 non-profit dedicated to promoting the combat robotics community. They also provide STEM (Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) programs, enabling young builders outside of the “BattleBox”. In my opinion, that’s super cool!

Andrea Gellatly of BattleBots Team Witch Doctor

On the Witch Doctor Youtube channel, look for the “Witch Doctor Junior” playlist. In this series of 9 videos, team member Andrea Gellatly covers everything you need to know to build and compete an antwaight (1 lb).

Electronics of the bot Andrea is building
Electronics inside the chassis

Andrea walks you through everything from the drive train to competing in your first tournament using the FingerTech Robotics Viper kit mentioned above.

I feel very comfortable recommending these videos as they are one of the most complete build series I have found on the net. You can view the videos here.

For Those That Like A Challenge

A third option would be to design and build the bot from scratch. This would be the choice for all the makers and creators out there. There’s some that get into the hobby just for the challenge of designing and building a combat robot.

Of course, building a fighting robot from scratch can seem pretty intimidating to many. But the bots built for the smaller weight divisions are typically pretty simple. Especially if a less complicated weapon or a wedge is incorporated into the design. More advanced weapon systems can always be added to your bot later when your technical confidence is higher due to more experience. 

The good news for those wanting to get started this way is there is tons of information available with a lot of these resources being totally free if you have an Internet connection. There’s several great websites and YouTube videos with detailed info on building combat robots from scratch. Google (or your favorite search engine) is your friend. But I think I better save that one for a future blog post since this one is getting a little long.

Putting This Post to Bed

In conclusion, not only is fighting bots loads fun, but it’s easy to become part of the growing combat robotics community – no matter your current technical level. Between books and the Internet, you can easily learn everything you need to get involved. And get your friends involved too. There’s no greater satisfaction than total destruction of your best friend’s bot.

Which Battery Do You Need?

You have been mulling the design of a new combat robot for a while. You just know you have the plans for a bot that’s gonna take names and kick some serious butt in your local combat robotics arena.

LiPo Batteries
FingerTech ‘Viper’ Combat Robot with vertical spinner

You’ve made a list of parts needed and you check it twice. A frame and armor (either ordering or 3D printing it) – check. Motors and wheels – check. A great weapon that will shred your friends’ bots – check. A receiver and ESCs (electronic speed controllers) – check. Wires, connectors, belts and switches – check. But it seems like something is missing. Hmmm… Yikes! No battery!

You have thoroughly researched all the other parts, but you totally forgot about a battery. How’s your little destruction machine supposed to come to life without any juice? Time to jump online for a little more digging.

You find out LiPo batteries (Lithium polymer, sometimes also abbreviated as LiPoly) are the batteries most used for smaller bots due to weight and size. You go to your favorite supplier to order one, but the site has a bunch of them. Then you start noticing all the specifications: S… V… mAh… A… C… mm… Holy crap! How do you know which battery you need?

LiPo Batteries
Galaxy 2 cell, 7.4 volt LiPo battery

You notice the battery above is listed as 2S 7.4V. You figure the V stands for voltage. But what is the 2S? With this LiPo, the 2 is the number of cells in the battery, S tells us the cells are wired in series, which means the voltage of each cell is added together to determine the total voltage of the battery. A single LiPo cell has a nominal voltage of 3.7V. A two cell (2S) LiPo has a total voltage of 7.4 volts, three cells (3S) at 11.1 volts, four cells (4S) would be 14.8 volts, and so on.

The capacity of a battery is typically specified in milliamp-hours (mAh), which indicates how much power it can produce. In the above case, the battery is rated with a capacity of 250mAh. But we don’t stop there. Next we need to multiply the capacity by the continuous C rate listed on the battery, which is the capacity multiplier. In the case of the battery above, we would multiply 250mAh by 35, which would give us 8,750mAh or 8.7 Amps. Will that be enough to power our bot? Maybe, but we need to do a couple more calculations just to make sure.

To make this simple, let’s say you are building a antweight wedge with no weapon. You have two FingerTech “Silver Spark” 16mm gearmotors to use for the bot.

Checking the specifications for the motors, usually listed in the seller or manufacturer’s item description on their website, look for the stall current. This is the maximum current draw (in Amps) that the motor will pull when it is completely stalled. We find the the motor is rated at 1.6A each. So 1.6 + 1.6 (two motors) = 3.2 total amps for both motors. If our battery can deliver 8.7 Amps, it seems like that would be more than enough for our needs. But would it be enough for the duration of a three-minute match?

Now we divide capacity by current – 250mAh / 3.2A (or .25Ah / 3.2A for even dimensions), which is .078A per hour. Multiply that by 60 (seconds) and we find we can draw 3.2A for 4.7 minutes. Enough for our needs.

That would work for our antweight wedge. But if you want to add a weapon, you may need to find a battery with a little higher capacity. You just add the weapon’s motor or servo’s stall current to those of the motors. A 300mAh battery would probably work just fine, but do the math to make sure.

Size matters when it comes to the smaller competition classes (fairyweight, antweight, beetleweight). Real estate is at a premium with less area to store the battery. So don’t forget to factor in size and weight of the battery when planning a new build. TIP: you need an accurate set of scales to make sure your bot is in compliance with the weight class you plan on competing in. A good set of digital kitchen scales should work just fine.

Now you know how to determine what battery you need when planning a new combat robotics build. Battery safety and correct charging and discharging is also important when working with LiPos, but I’ll save that for a later blog.

Share: